富家男女

对威廉·莎士比亚 (William Shakespeare) 的戏剧《无事生非》(Much Ado About Nothing) 的现代重新构想，背景设定在圣诞节。

Voice 1 (male professional announcer type) This neighborhood(1) was made for the wretched dignity of the petty bourgeoisie, for respectable occupations and intellectual tourism. The sedentary population of the upper floors was sheltered from the influences of the street. This neighborhood has remained the same. It was the strange setting of our story, where a systematic questioning of all the diversions and works of a society, a total critique of its idea of happiness, was expressed in acts.　　These people also scorned subjective profundity. They were interested in nothing but an adequate and concrete expression of themselves.　　Voice 2 (Debord, monotone) Human beings are not fully conscious of their real life - usually groping in the dark; overwhelmed by the consequences of their acts; at every moment groups and individuals find themselves confronted with results they have not wished.　　Voice 1 They said that oblivion was their ruling passion. They wanted to reinvent everything each day; to become the masters and possessors of their own lives.　　Just as one does not judge a man according to the conception he has of himself, one cannot judge such periods of transition according to their own consciousness; on the contrary, one must explain the consciousness through the contradictions of material life, through the conflict between social conditions and the forces of social production.　　The progress achieved in the domination of nature was not yet matched by a corresponding liberation of everyday life. Youth passed away among the various controls of resignation.　　Our camera has captured for you a few aspects of a provisional microsociety.　　The knowledge of empirical facts remains abstract and superficial as long as it is not concretized by its integration into the whole ” which alone permits the supersession of partial and abstract problems so as to arrive at their concrete essence, and implicitly at their meaning.　　This group was on the margins of the economy. It tended toward a role of pure consumption, and first of all the free consumption of its time. It thus found itself directly engaged in qualitative variations of everyday life but deprived of any means to intervene in them.　　The group ranged over a very small area. The same times brought them back to the same places. No one went to bed early. Discussion on the meaning of all this continued...　　Voice 2 Our life is a journey ” In the winter and the night. ” We seek our passage...�　　Voice 1 The abandoned literature nevertheless exerted a delaying action on new affective formulations.　　Voice 2 There was the fatigue and the cold of the morning in this much-traversed labyrinth, like an enigma that we had to resolve. It was a looking-glass reality through which we had to discover the potential richness of reality.　　On the bank of the river evening began once again; and caresses; and the importance of a world without importance. Just as the eyes have a blurred vision of many things and can see only one clearly, so the will can strive only incompletely toward diverse objects and can completely love only one at a time.　　Voice 3 (young girl) No one counted on the future. It would never be possible to be together later, or anywhere else. There would never be a greater freedom.　　Voice 1 The refusal of time and of growing old automatically limited encounters in this narrow, contingent zone, where what was lacking was felt as irreparable. The extreme precariousness of the means of getting by without working was at the root of this impatience which made excesses necessary and breaks definitive.　　Voice 2 One never really contests an organization of existence without contesting all of that organization's forms of language.　　Voice 1 When freedom is practiced in a closed circle, it fades into a dream, becomes a mere representation of itself. The ambiance of play is by nature unstable. At any moment ordinary life� can prevail once again. The geographical limitation of play is even more striking than its temporal limitation. Any game takes place within the contours of its spatial domain. Around the neighborhood, around its fleeting and threatened immobility, stretched a half-known city where people met only by chance, losing their way forever.　　The girls who found their way there, because they were legally under the control of their families until the age of eighteen, were often recaptured by the defenders of that detestable institution. They were generally confined under the guard of those creatures who among all the bad products of a bad society are the most ugly and repugnant nuns.　　What usually makes documentaries so easy to understand is the arbitrary limitation of their subject matter. They describe the atomization of social functions and the isolation of their products. One can, in contrast, envisage the entire complexity of a moment which is not resolved into a work, a moment whose movement indissolubly contains facts and values and whose meaning does not yet appear. The subject matter of the documentary would then be this confused totality.　　Voice 2 The era had arrived at a level of knowledge and technical means that made possible, and increasingly necessary, a direct construction of all aspects of a liberated affective and practical existence. The appearance of these superior means of action, still unused because of the delays in the project of liquidating the commodity economy, had already condemned aesthetic activity, whose ambitions and powers were both outdated. The decay of art and of all the values of former mores had formed our sociological background. The ruling class's monopoly over the instruments we needed to control in order to realize the collective art of our time had excluded us from a cultural production officially devoted to illustrating and repeating the past. An art film on this generation can only be a film on its absence of real creations.　　Everyone unthinkingly followed the paths learned once and for all, to their work and their home, to their predictable future. For them duty had already become a habit, and habit a duty. They did not see the deficiency of their city. They thought the deficiency of their life was natural. We wanted to break out of this conditioning, in quest of another use of the urban landscape, in quest of new passions. The atmosphere of a few places gave us intimations of the future powers of an architecture it would be necessary to create to be the support and framework for less mediocre games. We could expect nothing of anything we had not ourselves altered. The urban environment proclaimed the orders and tastes of the ruling society just as violently as the newspapers. It is man who makes the unity of the world, but man has extended himself everywhere. People can see nothing around them that is not their own image; everything speaks to them of themselves. Their very landscape is alive. There were obstacles everywhere. There was a cohesion in the obstacles of all types. They maintained the coherent reign of poverty. Everything being connected, it was necessary to change everything by a unitary struggle, or nothing. It was necessary to link up with the masses, but we were surrounded by sleep.　　Voice 3 The dictatorship of the proletariat is a desperate struggle, bloody and bloodless, violent and peaceful, military and economic, educational and administrative, against the forces and traditions of the old world.　　Voice 1 In this country it is once again the men of order who have rebelled. They have reinforced their power. They have been able to aggravate the grotesqueness of the ruling conditions according to their will. They have embellished their system with the funereal ceremonies of the past.　　Voice 2 Years, like a single instant prolonged to this point, come to an end.　　Voice 1 What was directly lived reappears frozen in the distance, fit into the tastes and illusions of an era, carried away with it.　　Voice 2 The appearance of events that we have not made, that others have made against us, now obliges us to be aware of the passage of time, its results, the transformation of our own desires into events. What differentiates the past from the present is precisely its out-of-reach objectivity; there is no more should-be; being is so consumed that it has ceased to exist. The details are already lost in the dust of time. Who was afraid of life, afraid of the night, afraid of being taken, afraid of being kept　　Voice 3 What should be abolished continues, and we continue to wear away with it. We are engulfed. We are separated. The years pass and we haven't changed anything.　　Voice 2 Once again morning in the same streets. Once again the fatigue of so many similarly passed nights. It is a walk that has lasted a long time.　　Voice 1 Really hard to drink more.　　Voice 2 Of course one might make a film of it. But even if such a film succeeds in being as fundamentally disconnected and unsatisfying as the reality it deals with, it will never be more than a re-creation ” poor and false like this botched traveling shot.　　Voice 3 There are now people who pride themselves on being authors of films, as others were authors of novels. They are even more backward than the novelists because they are unaware of the decomposition and exhaustion of individual expression in our time, ignorant of the end of the arts of passivity. They are praised for their sincerity since they dramatize, with more personal depth, the conventions of which their life consists. There is talk of the liberation of the cinema. But what does it matter to us if one more art is liberated through which Tom, Dick or Harry can joyously express their slavish sentiments The only interesting venture is the liberation of everyday life, not only in the perspectives of history but for us and right away. This entails the withering away of alienated forms of communication. The cinema, too, has to be destroyed.　　Voice 2 In the final analysis, stars are created by the need we have for them, and not by their talent or lack of talent or even by the film industry or advertising. Miserable need, dismal, anonymous life that would like to expand itself to the dimensions of cinema life. The imaginary life on the screen is the product of this real need. The star is the projection of this need.　　The images of the advertisements during the intermissions are more suited than any others for evoking an intermission of life.　　To really describe this era it would no doubt be necessary to show many other things. But what would be the point　　Better to grasp the totality of what has been done and what remains to be done than to add more ruins to the old world of the spectacle and of memories.　　1. This film, which evokes the lettrist experiences at the origin of the situationist movement, opens with shots of the Paris district frequented by the lettrists in the early 1950s.

成功的女商人薇薇安得知自己患有3期癌症。她聘请了一名私人护士杰卡来照顾她。但杰卡开始在薇薇安的生活中扮演更重要的角色，因为她成为薇薇安和她的儿子阿尔伯特之间的桥梁，阿尔伯特一生都感到被忽视。三者因环境而变化

懦弱的图书馆工作员继承了她父亲深爱的电影院。由于电影院生意的日益衰败，为了拯救家族生意，她发现了自己身体中所隐藏着一个连续杀人狂。 　　为了吸引狂热嗜血的电影粉丝们，影院上映了一系列惊悚短片。然而电影粉丝们并没有意识到，电影中的杀戮场面是不是过分真实了点。。。

一个古怪的年轻女子的家人拼命试图阻止她越来越色情的方式。

妈妈季佩珍（徐帆 饰）是这个家的灵魂所在，她像有分身术一样能照顾到每一个人。在她的面面俱到之下，这个家看上去井然有序，然而事实并非如此。在妈妈季佩珍眼里女儿李小美（张婧仪 饰）永远都是最优秀的，却不知在北京工作生活的她还有另一面。女儿对妈妈的掌控有多抵触，季佩珍更是不了解。医生丈夫李文舫（许亚军 饰）因几年前的一次失误，至今还无法拿起手术刀。婆婆患有阿尔兹海默症，生活都无法自理……就在身为教师的季佩珍刚刚退休，似乎能松一口气多拥有些自己的时间，却被查出了恶性肿瘤四期。如果妈妈只剩下四个月的生命，这家人的生活又该如何继续下去呢？

玛努埃拉（丝莉亚 洛芙　饰）的丈夫在儿子出生前就离开了妻子，玛努埃拉成为了单身妈妈，带着儿子埃斯特班来到马德里生活。儿子从不知道爸爸的事情，玛努埃拉只好对儿子说父亲已经过世。然而，儿子终究不相信。他在日记本里悄悄写下对父亲的想念。 　　车祸来得那么突然，儿子被一辆迎面撞来的汽车夺走了生命。母亲悲伤不已，决定去找孩子的父亲洛拉，完成儿子心愿。然而她却得知，洛拉已经换装成女人，当了妓女，而且染上了艾滋病。更不幸的是，修女罗萨（佩内洛普 饰）怀上了洛拉的孩子。玛努埃拉留在罗萨身边照顾她，罗萨诞下的婴儿也取自己儿子埃斯特班的名字，苦难的日子终于有了希望--这个新生儿竟然逃过了艾滋的噩运。

玛努埃拉（丝莉亚 洛芙　饰）的丈夫在儿子出生前就离开了妻子，玛努埃拉成为了单身妈妈，带着儿子埃斯特班来到马德里生活。儿子从不知道爸爸的事情，玛努埃拉只好对儿子说父亲已经过世。然而，儿子终究不相信。他在日记本里悄悄写下对父亲的想念。 　　车祸来得那么突然，儿子被一辆迎面撞来的汽车夺走了生命。母亲悲伤不已，决定去找孩子的父亲洛拉，完成儿子心愿。然而她却得知，洛拉已经换装成女人，当了妓女，而且染上了艾滋病。更不幸的是，修女罗萨（佩内洛普 饰）怀上了洛拉的孩子。玛努埃拉留在罗萨身边照顾她，罗萨诞下的婴儿也取自己儿子埃斯特班的名字，苦难的日子终于有了希望--这个新生儿竟然逃过了艾滋的噩运。

露丝·威尔森将主演新片[关于我的真相](TrueThingsAboutMe，暂译)。裘德·洛与合伙人通过旗下公司RiffRaffEntertainment挑选了剧本和女主威尔森。威尔森也将与裘德·洛等一同参与制片。本片由哈莉·伍特里夫([只有你])自编自导，改编自黛博拉·凯·戴维斯的同名小说，讲述了一个生活在社会边缘的年轻女子被一个陌生人颠覆平静生活的故事。影片将于2020年初开拍。

有时，世界充满了我们无法理解的事物。 【阿什坎、魔戒及其他故事】揭示了人们无法理解的错综复杂的世界链条。 Shahrooz 和 Reza 不顾他们的失明试图抢劫一家珠宝店。酒店员工阿什坎一次又一次地尝试自杀。他遇到了 Shahrooz 和 Reza 并加入了他们的犯罪行列。对阿什坎来说，这只是另一种自杀方式。但这还不是全部。出现了许多其他角色 - 一对夫妇逃离反对他们婚姻的父亲，一名受雇的刺客追捕他们并且他的荒谬死亡，一名想要离开伊朗的雕塑家，一名 Reza 向其求婚的医科学生，以及一名正在追踪的警察一个罪犯。他们的故事有时会回到过去，看起来完全无关，但所有的片段都在电影的后半部分就位。虽然这么多角色的出现和不友好的故事发展可能会让观众感到不舒服，但它仍然赋予了很多乐趣。

一个街头聪明但天真的菲律宾女童认为自己是真正的法国女王，并将踏上危险的旅程，回到她想象中的巴黎王国。

66岁的施密特先生（杰克•尼科尔森 Jack Nicholson 饰）退休赋闲在家，无所事事的生活让他颇感无聊。每天依旧7点起床，可是陪伴他的只是无聊的字谜游戏和令人生厌的妻子，施密特需要找点事来改变自己的生活，于是他打算资助一位坦桑尼亚的孤儿恩度古，并提笔给他写了第一封信。妻子的忽然离世让他的生活显得更加冷清，他曾至开始想念那个乏味的女人，可是就在这时，他在妻子的换衣间里找到妻子和另一个男人的情书。施密特决定独自驾车去旅行，他去了很多曾经生活过的地方，回忆当年感慨良多。在一时冲动亲吻一位有夫之妇之后，他慢慢的原谅了自己的妻子。女儿的婚姻比自己想像的更糟，平庸的丈夫和不可思议的家庭让他对女儿的未来愈加担忧，然而这一切都非他所能改变。旅途中他从未停止给恩度古写信，在信里，施密特详尽的描述着自己的生活和困惑。当施密特参加完女儿的婚礼，回到家时意外的收到恩度古的回信，看着那些简单的文字和恩度古充满童真的图画，施密特忽然泪如泉涌……

无尽之中，我们被一个女人温柔的声音引导着整个世界。那是一种神话般的声音，一首Scheherazade给我们讲述了人类生活和奋斗的永恒故事：“我看到一个孩子在雨下走着去参加生日聚会……”“我看到一个还没有找到爱的男孩……”“我看到一个不再信任银行的男人……”我们从一系列显而易见的琐碎瞬间，看到男人和生活的平凡和宏伟，这些琐碎的时刻反映了生活的辉煌：一个女孩第一次握住一个心爱的男孩的手；一个父亲在倾盆大雨中系住他女儿的鞋带；一个年轻的女人等待她的ap。点睛之笔——但也包括人类残忍表现在平庸中的时刻——一个人拖着十字架；一个残废的战争老兵坐在路边；一个父亲把死去的儿子抱在怀里——就像生命的号角一样，关于永无尽头，向我们展示了祢的宝贵和美丽。R存在，唤醒我们希望保持这永恒的宝藏并传递它。

一次偶然中，雷吉纳（桑迪·牛顿 Thandie Newton 饰）邂逅了名为查理（斯蒂芬·迪兰 Stephen Dillane 饰）的男子，两人很快就坠入了爱河，并且决定携手步入婚姻的殿堂。可新婚的甜蜜劲过去之后，雷吉纳发现查理是一个背负了许多秘密的男人，这个整天躺在自己身边的男人，自己或许对他毫不了解。于是，雷吉纳决定去旅行散心，顺便思考一下自己的这段草率的婚姻。　　可是，当雷吉纳返回巴黎住所后，等待着她的并非查理，而是空空如也的房间，以及自称是查理同伴的三个陌生人。三人告诉雷吉纳，查理手上拿着本该和他们平分的一大笔钱，如今查理失踪了，身为他的妻子，雷吉纳有责任供出这笔钱的下落。

妮娜（安娜·车波夫斯卡 Anna Chipovskaya 饰）和丈夫亚历山大（阿雷克西·查多夫 Aleksei Chadov 饰）之间的感情非常要好，两个人一个拥有美丽的样貌，一个拥有丰富的学识，他们的婚姻一直都是朋友们眼中的典范。然而，当严重的财政危机击中了这个家庭后，妮娜和亚历山大开始渐行渐远，两人的婚姻出现了裂痕。　　亚历山大欠了银行一大笔钱，而负责处理这笔债务的，是名叫谢尔盖（Dmitri Pevtsov 饰）的男子。虽然谢尔盖也有着自己的妻子和家庭，可是，在同妮娜相处的过程中，两人不可自持的产生了背德的感情。在这股感情的漩涡里，妮娜越陷越深。